Brooks
Brooks v. Bastiat USA, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VALERIE BROOKS, individually and No. 2:21-cv-00078-JAM-CKD on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
v. Y.Y.G.M. SA d/b/a BRANDY MELVILLE, a Swiss Corporation, et. Al. Defendants. 17 Valerie Brooks (“Plaintiff” or “Brooks”) sued Y.Y.G.M. SA doing business as Brandy Melville (“Defendant” or “YYGM”), a Swiss corporation, alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq. and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s ADA and Unruh claims for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). See Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 9. Plaintiff opposes the motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 11. Defendants replied. See Reply, ECF No. 13. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s…