Spears

(PS) Spears v. Spears

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20212:21-cv-01472California2,968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAUREN SPEARS, No. 2:21–cv–1472–TLN–CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER BRIAN K. SPEARS, (ECF No. 4) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is representing herself in this action, again seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) with her complaint. (ECF Nos. 1, 4.) See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because the IFP application is incomplete, the court denies plaintiff’s IFP request without prejudice to re- submission of a complete application within 30 days. Further, because it is unclear what plaintiff is alleging and how this federal court has jurisdiction over the case, plaintiff shall also have 30 days to file an amended complaint. I. IFP Request When plaintiff filed her complaint and first request for leave to proceed IFP, she used a state court form and listed her address as that of the El Dorado County Jail. (ECF No. 2 at 1.) The court denied plaintiff’s original IFP request because the state court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.