Hamilton

Henderson v. Hamilton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20211:21-cv-00697California4,314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DAE HENDERSON, JR., Case No. 1:21-cv-00697-NONE-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

THE COURT TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S

JULY 12, 2021 LODGED AMENDED v.

COMPLAINT AS THE SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT JEFFREY Y. HAMILTON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

(Doc. 8)

17 I. INTRODUCTION On April 28, 2021, Plaintiff Dae Henderson, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed a complaint. (Doc. 1 (“Compl.”).) On June 30, 2021, before the Court screened the initial complaint, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint as a matter of course, see Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(1). (Doc. 6.) On July 12, 2021, Plaintiff lodged another amended complaint1 (Doc. 8) and filed an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 7),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.