Olliff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GRINDSTONE INDIAN RANCHERIA No. 2:17-cv-02292-JAM-JDP and ONE HUNDRED PLUS MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN LIVING ON

THE GRINDSTONE INDIAN

RESERVATION, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 60(b) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE Plaintiffs, COURT’S DENIAL OF PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

v. TERRANCE OLLIFF, et al., Defendants. 16 With their present motion,1 Plaintiffs attempt to take a third bite at the apple. See Pls.’ Mot. for Relief (“Mot.”), ECF No. 65. This attempt fails. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is denied. 21 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 2, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a motion for summary adjudication on their declaratory relief claim. See Pls.’ Mot. for Summ. Adjudication (“First Mot.”), ECF No. 29. On August 14,

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for November 16, 2021. 1…