Munoz

Munoz v. Peterson Recovery Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20211:21-cv-01026California2,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS MUNOZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-1026-AWI-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

v. LACK OF JURISDICTION, FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM, AND FAILURE TO

PETERSON RECOVERY GROUP; PROSECUTE1

WESTERN RECOVERY,

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Carlos Munoz, who is proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a complaint on June 29, 2021. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). On July 1, 2021, the Court entered an order directing Plaintiff to either show cause why this Court has jurisdiction, file an amended complaint, or voluntarily dismiss the action within twenty-one days. (Doc. No. 2, “July 1 Order”). Because Plaintiff has not timely responded or otherwise complied with the July 1 Order, the undersigned recommends the district court dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction, or alternatively for failure to prosecute, as set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.