Just

(PC) Williams v. Just

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20212:18-cv-00740California509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, No. 2:18-CV-0740-MCE-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS D. JUST, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 26, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file his pre-trial statement within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. On September 13, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time and directed that his pre-trial statement be filed within 60 days of the date of the Court’s order. More than 60 days have elapsed and Plaintiff has not complied. The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.