(PS)At Home Electric v. The Hartford
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AT HOME ELECTRIC and HEATH V. No. 2:21-cv-01892 TLN AC PS
FULKERSON,
12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.
THE HARTFORD,
15 Defendant.
17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On November 19, 2021, defendants filed motions for a more definite statement and to dismiss this case. ECF Nos. 7, 8. Plaintiffs did not respond. On November 19, 2021, the court issued an order informing plaintiffs that a corporate entity (At Home Electric) could not be represented by a pro se litigant but instead must be represented by counsel. ECF No. 10. The court issued an order to show cause requiring plaintiffs to either drop At Home Electric as a plaintiff or obtain counsel for it by November 22, 2021. Id. at 2. Plaintiffs were cautioned that failure respond would lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiffs again…