(PC)Wallace

(PC)Wallace v. White

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20211:20-cv-00844California357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM JAMES WALLACE, II, Case No. 1:20-cv-00844-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

J. WHITE, et al., OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN

Defendants. THIRTY DAYS (ECF No. 47) 17 18 Plaintiff William James Wallace, II (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro 19 se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On October 25, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 47.) 21 Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion within 22 twenty-one days, Local Rule 230(l), but did not do so. Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure to oppose a motion “may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” While a motion for summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.