Kitt
(PC) Jongpil Park v. Kitt
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONGPIL PARK Case No. 1:19-cv-01551-AWI-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT VICTOR V. KITT, (Doc. No. 35) Defendant. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16
18 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Victor V. Kitt on March 26, 2021. (Doc. No. 35, “MSJ”). Plaintiff filed an opposition on May 17, 2021 (Doc. No. 41), and on May 24, 2021, Defendant filed a reply (Doc No. 42). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned finds no genuine dispute as to any material facts and recommends Defendant’s MSJ be granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jongpil Park (“Plaintiff” or “Park”), a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 31, 2019. (Doc. No. 1). On April 9, 2020, the then-assigned magistrate…