(SS) Curlee v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20211:20-cv-00145California749 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY JOHN CURLEE, Case No. 1:20-cv-00145-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 35) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

16 On January 29, 2020, Plaintiff Larry John Curlee, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying an application for benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) In his complaint, Plaintiff claims he is currently “at Coalinga State Hospital on a VOLUNTARY BASIS to receive treatment and evaluation.” (Id. at 3.) The Court has previously twice denied Plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel. (ECF Nos. 30, 34.) On November 24, 2021, Plaintiff filed a third motion for appointment of counsel, as well as an opening brief in this action. (ECF Nos. 35, 36.) Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.