Yap

(PS) Conerly v. Yap

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20212:21-cv-01132California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARINA CONERLY, No. 2:21-cv-01132-TLN-CKD Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.

JULIE G. YAP, et al., Defendants. 16 On July 26, 2021, and again on October 27, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF Nos. 4, 8) in this matter which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On August 10, 2021 and on November 10, 2021, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF Nos. 5, 9.) This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court assumes its correctness and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.