Valley National Bank v. Road Liner LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1155 - AWI - JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT ) JUDGMENT ROAD LINER LLC, ) ) (Docs. 11, 13) Defendant. ) )

Valley National Bank assert that Road Liner LLC breached a contract related to the financing of premiums charged by an insurance company. (Doc. 1.) Because Road Liner LLC failed to respond to the allegations in the complaint, Plaintiff requested default judgment pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 11.) The magistrate judge determined the factors set forth by the Ninth Circuit in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1986) weighed in favor of the entry of default judgment. (Doc. 13 at 5-7.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the motion for default judgment be granted. In addition, the magistrate judge recommended judgement be…