J.P.

J.P. v. City of Stockton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20212:21-cv-00788California3,204 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 ESTATE OF SAOUN POL and J.P., No. 2:21-cv-00788 WBS AC Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF STOCKTON, STOCKTON

POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERIC JONES,

JORGE ANDRADE, BRADLEY MILLER, and DOE 1 to 10, 17 Defendants.

19 ----oo0oo---- 20 Plaintiff J.P., the son of the late Saoun Pol (“Pol” or 21 “decedent”), brings this case individually and in his 22 representative capacity as successor-in-interest to Pol, alleging 23 eight claims against the City of Stockton (“the City”), the 24 Stockton Police Department, Police Chief of the Stockton Police 25 Department Eric Jones (“Jones”), and Stockton Police Department 26 police officers Jorge Andrade (“Andrade”) and Bradley Miller 27 (“Miller”). Defendants now move to dismiss portions of 28 plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC” (Docket No. 16)) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss (Docket No. 17).) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.