Merritt
(PC) Jackson v. Merritt
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE JACKSON, Case No. 1:18-cv-01327-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENTT1
LAURA MERRITT and RN MCCOY, (Doc. No. 27) Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 17 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Laura Merritt and M. McCoy on July 2, 2020. (Doc. No. 27, “MSJ”). Plaintiff did not file an opposition. (See Doc. No. 29). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned finds no genuine dispute as to any material facts and recommends Defendants’ MSJ be granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Antoine Jackson (“Plaintiff” or “Jackson”), a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 26, 2018. (Doc. No. 1). On May 28, 2019, the then-assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint pursuant to