Espinosa

(PC) Maraglino v. Espinosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20211:20-cv-00825California849 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOROTHY GRACE MARIE 1:20-cv-00825-AWI-GSA-PC

MARAGLINO,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR Plaintiff, APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. (ECF No. 13.)

J. ESPINOSA, et al., ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS ISSUED ON Defendants. NOVEMBER 8, 2021 (ECF No. 12.)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF UNTIL

JANUARY 4, 2022 TO FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT

DEADLINE: JANUARY 4, 2022

20 I. BACKGROUND Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On September 13, 2021, the court issued a screening order dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.