(PC) Hammler v. Dignity Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20211:20-cv-01778California4,150 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 1:20-cv-1778-NONE-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) OR DUE TO DIGNITY HEALTH, ET. AL., SUFFICIENT FUNDS IN INMATE

ACCOUNT1

Defendants.

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

16 (Doc. No. 9) 17

Plaintiff Allen Hammler, a prisoner incarcerated at California State Prison, Corcoran, initiated this action by filing a pro se prisoner civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 17, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff did not accompany the filing of his Complaint with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or the requisite filing fee. On June 17, 2021 the undersigned issued an order directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file an IFP motion within twenty-one days. (Doc. No. 3). After being granted an enlargement of time to comply with the Court’s June 17 order,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.