Vasquez
(PC) Cortinas v. Vasquez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00367-NONE-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING EVIDENTIARY
HEARING ON EXHAUSTION OF
v. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
VASQUEZ, et al., Date: March 17, 2022 Time: 10:00 a.m. Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT
LIMITED DISCOVERY
17 (Doc. 69) 18 Defendants move for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 61.) The Court finds that material disputes of fact exist regarding whether administrative remedies were available to Plaintiff, see Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 642-644 (2016), Andres v. Marshall, 867 F.3d 1076, 1078-79 (9th Cir. 2017), Rupe v. Beard, No. 2:08-cv-02454-EFS, 2013 WL 2458398, at *14-15 (E.D. Cal. 2013), and that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve the disputes, see Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1170- 71 (9th Cir.…