Sullivan
(PC) Solorio v. Sullivan
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20211:19-cv-00688California629 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ADRIAN SOLORIO, 1:19-cv-00688-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AS FUTILE
vs. (ECF No. 56.)
SULLIVAN, et al., ORDER FOR CLERK TO SEND PLAINTIFF A
COPY OF THE COURT’S ORDER ISSUED ON
Defendants. SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 (ECF No. 44.) 16 I. BACKGROUND Adrian Solorio (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on April 30, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, filed on October 8, 2020, against defendants Ottsman and Chavez on Plaintiff’s medical claims under the Eighth Amendment; and against defendants Ottsman, Chavez, Clayton, R. J. Maciejewski,1 and Cardenas for use of excessive force under the Eighth Amendment. On December 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for…