Sullivan

(PC) Solorio v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20211:19-cv-00688California629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIAN SOLORIO, 1:19-cv-00688-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AS FUTILE

vs. (ECF No. 56.)

SULLIVAN, et al., ORDER FOR CLERK TO SEND PLAINTIFF A

COPY OF THE COURT’S ORDER ISSUED ON

Defendants. SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 (ECF No. 44.) 16 I. BACKGROUND Adrian Solorio (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on April 30, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, filed on October 8, 2020, against defendants Ottsman and Chavez on Plaintiff’s medical claims under the Eighth Amendment; and against defendants Ottsman, Chavez, Clayton, R. J. Maciejewski,1 and Cardenas for use of excessive force under the Eighth Amendment. On December 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.