Kyle

(PC) Harris v. Kyle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20211:19-cv-00462California2,688 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVONTE B. HARRIS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00462-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO

v. OPPOSE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO REOPEN

K KYLE, et al., DISCOVERY Defendant. (ECF No. 118, 119) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff Devonte B. Harris (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action arises out of 19 Plaintiff’s claims for deliberate indifference to serious risk of harm in violation of the Eighth 20 Amendment against Defendants Kyle, Grossman, Thompson, Depovic, Moreno, Overly, Wright, 21 Gamez, and Castillo, and for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment against Defendants Kyle, Moreno, Wright, Overly, Gamez, and Castillo (collectively, “Defendants”). (ECF Nos. 1, 10, 15, 17, 31.) Before the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.