(PS) Coxon v. United States District Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20212:21-cv-00792California420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN COXON, Case No. 2:21-cv-00792-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ECF No. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendant. ECF No. 2

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS 19 ORDER Plaintiff moves to proceed without prepaying filing fees. ECF No. 2. Plaintiff’s affidavit satisfies the relevant requirements, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), and so the motion, ECF No. 2, is granted. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, this complaint is now subject to screening. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must dismiss any action filed in forma pauperis that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.