Jackson v. Fastenal Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20211:20-cv-00345California10,807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIESHIA MARIE JACKSON, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00345-NONE-SAB

Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS

FASTENAL COMPANY, ACTION SETTLEMENT

Defendant. (ECF No. 15)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

17 18 19 Plaintiff Mieshia Marie Jackson brings this action on behalf of herself and others similarly situated against Defendant Fastenal Company, alleging various wage and hour violations under California state law. (ECF No. 1-1.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement and certification of the class for purposes of settlement. (ECF No. 15.) The Court, having reviewed the record, found this matter suitable for decision without oral argument under Local Rule 230(g), and the previously scheduled hearing set 26 1 Pursuant to the Court’s standing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.