Jackson v. Fastenal Company
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20211:20-cv-00345California10,807 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MIESHIA MARIE JACKSON, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00345-NONE-SAB
Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS
FASTENAL COMPANY, ACTION SETTLEMENT
Defendant. (ECF No. 15)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
17 18 19 Plaintiff Mieshia Marie Jackson brings this action on behalf of herself and others similarly situated against Defendant Fastenal Company, alleging various wage and hour violations under California state law. (ECF No. 1-1.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement and certification of the class for purposes of settlement. (ECF No. 15.) The Court, having reviewed the record, found this matter suitable for decision without oral argument under Local Rule 230(g), and the previously scheduled hearing set 26 1 Pursuant to the Court’s standing…