(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01288-AWI-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
v. TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS
CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE AS MOOT RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., (Docs. 28, 30) Defendants.
17 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s fourth and fifth motions for a temporary restraining order 18 (TRO).1 (Docs. 28, 30.) In both motions, Plaintiff states that prison officials at Kern Valley State 19 Prison (KVSP) placed him administrative segregation, and he requests a court order directing the 20 officials to return him to the general population and place him single-cell housing. (See id.) After 21 filing his motions, Plaintiff filed a notice that he had been transferred to Substance Abuse 22 Treatment Facility and State Prison, Corcoran (CSATF). (Doc. 32.) Plaintiff’s motions are 23 therefore moot. 24 A claim is moot if the applicable “issues are no longer live or the parties lack a legally…