Smith v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20211:21-cv-01613California777 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1: 21-cv-01613-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

CITY OF FRESNO, et al., REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE

FILING FEE

Defendants. (ECF No. 3)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 Plaintiff Candace Smith filed a complaint in this action on November 4, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 3.) However, the Court found Plaintiff’s application did not contain sufficient information for the Court to determine if she is entitled to proceed in this action without prepayment of fees. Specifically, the application shows Plaintiff denies any amount of income from any source in the past 12 months, denies having any cash or money in a bank account, and denies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.