Gamboa

(PC) Wren v. Gamboa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20211:21-cv-00753California487 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY CHARLES WREN, Case No. 1:21-cv-00753-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE

GAMBOA, et al., REMEDIES

Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Jeffrey Charles Wren is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. In his first amended complaint, Plaintiff indicates that he has not filed an administrative grievance regarding any of his claims. (Doc. 18 at 3, 4, 5.) The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under . . . any other Federal law . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Exhaustion of administrative remedies is mandatory and “unexhausted claims cannot be brought in court.” Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.