Gamboa
(PC) Wren v. Gamboa
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY CHARLES WREN, Case No. 1:21-cv-00753-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE
GAMBOA, et al., REMEDIES
Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Jeffrey Charles Wren is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. In his first amended complaint, Plaintiff indicates that he has not filed an administrative grievance regarding any of his claims. (Doc. 18 at 3, 4, 5.) The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under . . . any other Federal law . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Exhaustion of administrative remedies is mandatory and “unexhausted claims cannot be brought in court.” Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199,…