Hamilton

Hamilton v. Madera County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20211:20-cv-00484California9,787 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICK HAMILTON, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-EPG Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE

v. TO AMEND COUNTY OF MADERA, et al., (ECF No. 29) Defendants. 16 Before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants County of Madera, Madera County Board of Supervisors, Tom Wheeler, Matt Treber, Deborah Mahler, and John Reed (“Defendants”). (ECF No. 29.) The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. (ECF Nos. 43, 48.) For the following reasons, the Court will grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss without further leave to amend the complaint. I. BACKGROUND This case stems from a multi-year dispute between residential property owners, Plaintiffs Rick Hamilton and Kris Hamilton (“Plaintiffs”), and the County of Madera. As alleged in the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), those disputes began…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.