Cissna
(PS) Van den Heuvel v. Cissna
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:21-cv-1342-KJM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 TERI CISSNA, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s motions for extension of time and first amended complaint filed on October 15, 2021 are before the court. (ECF Nos. 6, 7, 8.) Plaintiff has also filed a second motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 11) and other miscellaneous documents (ECF Nos. 9, 10, 12, 13, 14). By this order, the court notifies plaintiff the first amended complaint fails to state a claim. Plaintiff will be granted a final opportunity to amend as set forth herein. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action with a civil complaint seeking damages filed on July 30, 2021. By order dated September 23, 2021, the court screened the complaint, found it failed to state a claim for relief, and granted…