Haile
(PC) Sahm v. Haile
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY CARL SAHM, No. 2:21-cv-1436-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. HAILE, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action, which was removed from state court by defendant Haile. Following the dismissal of his original complaint on screening1 (ECF Nos. 1 & 6), plaintiff has filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 8), which the court must now screen. As discussed below, plaintiff’s amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff alleges he suffers from the following medical conditions: curvature of the spine, arthritis of the spine, sciatica, bursitis of the legs, back, neck, hands, and feet, a broken leg, toenail issues, and an amputated toe. ECF No. 8 at 3. He alleges that Dr. Haile “has not provided
1 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or…