Koresko

Koresko v. Cook

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20211:21-cv-01432California419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN J KORESKO, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01432-DAD-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE v. ) TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS ) TURHAN COOK, an individual, et al., ) [21-DAY DEADLINE]

Defendants. ) ) )

On October 21, 2021, the Court dismissed the complaint and directed the plaintiff to file a first amended complaint within thirty days. (Doc. 5.) More than thirty days have passed, and the plaintiff has not filed a first amended complaint. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District courts have inherent power to control their dockets” and, in exercising that power, may impose 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.