Vasquezcoy

(PC) Hudson v. Vasquezcoy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20211:21-cv-01060California640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IKEEM JARMER HUDSON, Case No. 1:21-cv-01060-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

v. PROSECUTE

J. VASQUEZCOY, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. Clerk of Court to assign a district judge.

16 On August 31, 2021, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 7.) The Court served the IFP order on Plaintiff by U.S. Postal Service. On September 22, 2021, the U.S. Postal Service returned the order as undeliverable. To date, Plaintiff has not updated his address with the Court or responded to the IFP order. As explained in the Court’s first informational order, a party appearing pro se must keep the Court advised of his current address. (Doc. 2 at 5.) Pursuant to the Local Rules, if mail directed to a pro se plaintiff at his address of record is returned by the U.S. Postal Service and the plaintiff fails to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.