(PC)Anderson

(PC)Anderson v. Sanborn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20212:21-cv-00561California335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELVIN RAY ANDERSON, No. 2:21-cv-0561-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

K.T. SANBORN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 18, 2021, the court informed plaintiff that he could proceed with a potentially cognizable retaliation claim against defendants Sanborn and Reyes, or he could file an amended complaint in an effort to also state claims against defendants Deters and De Jesus. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has elected not to amend his complaint and to proceed only with the claim identified by the court. ECF No. 12. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. ///// ///// ///// ///// ] Further, it is RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs claims against defendants Deters and De 2 || Jesus be dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.