Clendenin

(PC) Felix v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20211:19-cv-01784California851 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT EMERSON FELIX, Case No. 1:19-cv-01784-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT ZELT SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT

CLENDENIN, et al., INFORMATION TO EFFECTUATE

SERVICE

Defendants. (ECF No. 27)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 I. Introduction Plaintiff Scott Emerson Felix (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institution Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). As Plaintiff is a civil detainee and has paid the filing fee, he is not a prisoner or proceeding in forma pauperis, and therefore the Court ordered the complaint to be served without screening. (ECF No. 13.) This action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.