Yanez

(PS) Universal Security and Fire, Inc. v. Yanez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20212:17-cv-00844California3,173 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNIVERSAL SECURITY AND FIRE,

INC.,

No. 2:17-cv-00844-TLN-CKD Plaintiff,

ORDER v. 15 ALPHA ALARM & AUDIO, INC. and FRANK CHARLES YANEZ, Defendants,

18 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Alpha Alarm & Audio, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff Universal Security and Fire, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 37.) Defendant replied. (ECF No. 38.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. /// /// ///

Defendant Frank Charles Yanez does not join in the instant motion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from Defendant’s alleged acquisition and use of confidential information related to Plaintiff’s efforts to secure potential customers. (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 14, 17–18.) Plaintiff filed this action on April 21, 2017, alleging against Defendant violation of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.