(HC) Selck v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20212:21-cv-01499California299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:21-CV-1499-JAM-DMC-P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion, ECF No. 5, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, which the Court found was defective, see ECF No. 6. A review of the record reflects that, on November 12, 2021, Petitioner paid the filing fees for this action. Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is, therefore, moot. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that Petitioner’s motion, ECF No. 5, be denied as moot. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.