Green

(PS) Mehl v. Green

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20212:21-cv-01861California178 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GAVIN MEHL, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01861-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT

V. PREJUDICE WARREN GREEN, et al., ECF No. 7 Defendants. 16 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss or to strike the complaint. ECF No. 7. Defendants 18 argue that the complaint does not plead sufficiently detailed or specific factual allegations and is, 19 therefore, defective for failing to articulate a plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 20 (2009). Plaintiffs have now filed an amended complaint. ECF No. 16. Without expressing any view as to its merits, the court dismisses defendants’ motion to dismiss without prejudice. 22 Defendants are directed to either answer the new complaint or file a new motion, as appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

( 1 Oy — Dated: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.