Pena

(PC) Stanford v. Pena

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20212:18-cv-03007California1,130 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES R. STANFORD, Case No. 2:18-cv-03007-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME

v. AND DENYING HIS MOTIONS TO

MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER, FOR

A. PENA, et al., RECONSIDERATION, AND TO APPOINT

AN EXPERT WITNESS

Defendants. ECF Nos. 45, 46, 49, 53, & 54

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME ECF Nos. 50 & 56 19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Several motions are currently pending before the court, most of which are addressed herein. Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order Plaintiff has filed a motion to modify the scheduling order to extend the deadline for completion of discovery. ECF No. 45. A court’s scheduling order “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.