Weiss

(PC) Hernandez v. Weiss

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20212:20-cv-01006California508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANDRES C. HERNANDEZ, Case No. 2:20-cv-01006-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

v. ECF No. 30 RICHARD WEISS,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendant. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED

15 ECF No. 31

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 18 19 Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time, which states that he is seeking approval “to file a motion.” ECF No. 30. The court has not yet issued a scheduling order setting deadlines for filing discovery and dispositive motions. Plaintiff’s motion is denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 31. The two-page motion, which is not accompanied by supporting evidence, contains no arguments relating to plaintiff’s claims. Instead, the motion recites the standard applicable to motions for summary

1 Defendant has filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.