(PS) Jones v. Velocity Technology Solutions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARRISON JONES, Case No. 2:19-cv-02374-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS SOLUTIONS, et al., ORDER VACATING THE DECEMBER 16, Defendants. 2021 MOTION HEARING

17 On November 12, 2021, defendants filed a motion to dismiss and noticed the motion for hearing. ECF No. 109. Plaintiff has not responded, and the deadline to do so has passed. Accordingly, I will order plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The court will also grant plaintiff another opportunity to respond to the pending motion. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order. …