Flores

(PC) Johnson v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20211:21-cv-01491California666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, No. 1:21-cv-01491-NONE-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

ACTION

FLORES, (Doc. No. 15) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Christopher Johnson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 8, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge found that the court lacks subject- matter jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims because plaintiff had not alleged injury in fact, and that plaintiff’s claims for mental or emotional injuries are barred by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). (Doc. No. 13.) The magistrate judge therefore ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause on 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.