Evans

Evans v. Jacobsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20212:17-cv-01619California7,651 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANNICE EVANS, individually and as No. 2:17-cv-01619-TLN-AC Successor in Interest to Decedent ANGEL RAMOS; DANTE RAMOS, in his individual capacity; PHILLIP WILSON- VAUGHN, in his individual capacity; ORDER LEANN SANCHEZ, in her individual capacity; D.W., by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, CARITA WILSON; and ALICIA SADDLER, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for minor G.W., 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 CITY OF VALLEJO; a municipal corporation; ZACK JACOBSEN, Police Officer for the City of Vallejo; and Does 1–50, individually and in their official capacities as Police Officers for the City of Vallejo, inclusive, Defendants. 23 This matter is before the Court on Defendants City of Vallejo (“City”) and Zack Jacobsen’s (“Jacobsen”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff Annice Evans (“Plaintiff”) opposes the motion. (ECF No. 43.) Defendants have filed a reply. (ECF No. 45.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.