Gilbert v. Shahi Associates Incorporated
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01375-DAD-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE SHAHI v. ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED dba WATERFORD MARKET AS A PARTY IN
SHAHI ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED THIS ACTION
dba WATERFORD MARKET, et al., (ECF No. 10) Defendants.
16 On December 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of Defendant Shahi Associates Incorporated dba Waterford Market pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (ECF No. 10.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)); but see Hells Canyon Pres. Council v.…