(PC) Holguin v. Bell
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FELIPE ROMAN HOLGUIN, Case No. 19-cv-00757-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT1 BELL, DIAZ, RAMOS, (Doc. No. 29) Defendant. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
ORDER TO ASSIGN TO DISTRICT JUDGE
16 17 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Bell, Diaz, and Ramos on July 30, 2020. (Doc. No. 29, “MSJ”). On August 24, 2020, Plaintiff filed an opposition. (Doc. No. 33). On August 31, 2020, Defendants filed a reply, with additional evidence. (Doc No. 34). Plaintiff filed a sur-reply with new evidence on September 21, 2020. (Doc No. 34). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that the Court grant Defendants’ MSJ. BACKGROUND A. Summary of Plaintiff’s Complaint Plaintiff Felipe Roman Holguin (“Plaintiff” or “Holguin”), a state prisoner, initiated…