Strohmaier

Strohmaier v. Fresno VA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20211:21-cv-01746California369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADFORD C. STROHMAIER, Case No. 1:21-cv-01746-NONE-EPG

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v.

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

FRESNO VA, PAUPERIS BE DENIED

Defendant. (ECF No. 2)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

17 Plaintiff Bradford C. Strohmaier (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action. On December 9, 2021, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) According to Plaintiff’s application, Plaintiff has $140,000.00 in cash in his checking or savings accounts. (Id.) Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff can afford to pay the filing fee for this action. Because Plaintiff can afford to pay the filing fee for this action, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee of $402.00 for this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.