Carrillo

Williams v. Carrillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20211:21-cv-01659California4,892 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01659-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: BAZALEEL CARRILLO, et al., (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND ON HIS

COMPLAINT

17 (ECF No. 1)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

19 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on November 17, 2021. (ECF No. 1). Upon review, the Court concludes that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff now has the following options as to how to proceed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Or Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court saying that he wants to stand on this complaint and have it reviewed by the assigned district judge, in which case the Court will issue findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.