(PC) Driver v. Kern County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20212:20-cv-01665California919 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, No. 2: 20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s September 13, 2021, and October 15, 2021 motions to be taken off anti-psychotic medication, construed as motions for injunctive relief. (ECF Nos. 77, 83.) On November 18, 2021, the undersigned ordered defendants to file a supplemental opposition to these motions. (ECF No. 94.) On December 8, 2021, defendants filed a supplemental opposition. (ECF No. 100.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s motions to be taken off anti-psychotic medication be denied. Background This action proceeds on plaintiff’s amended complaint against defendants Bansal, Dr. Rauf and Maya. (ECF No. 13.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.