Axlex

(PC) Springfield v. Axlex

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20212:21-cv-00336California1,195 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD, No. 2:21-cv-0336 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

D. AXLEX, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint raising First and Eighth Amendment alleged violations by defendants Valencia, Barrow, and Cannizzaro at California Medical Facility (“CMF”), and defendants Axlex, Hobbs, Cook, Laughlin, Azuari, Peters and Cassesi at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”), all of which took place in 2020. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order is before the court. As discussed below, the undersigned recommends that the motion be denied. Plaintiff’s Motion Plaintiff claims that in March of 2021, while housed at California Health Care Facility (“CHCF”) in Stockton, plaintiff’s property was intentionally confiscated and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.