Zepp

(PC) Turner v. Zepp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20211:20-cv-00184California498 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINCENT TURNER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00184-AWI-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

ANDREW ZEPP, et al., OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN

Defendants. THIRTY DAYS (ECF Nos. 72, 74) 17 18 Plaintiff Vincent Turner (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On October 28, 2021, Defendant Khaled A. Tawansy filed a motion for summary 21 judgment. (ECF No. 72.) On November 1, 2021, Defendant Andrew Zepp filed a motion for 22 summary judgment. (ECF No. 74.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to each motion within twenty-one days. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). On November 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Plaintiff Defense Against the Summary Judgment.” (ECF No. 78.) This document…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.