Melero

Melero v. Ruiz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20211:21-cv-01226California1,539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NARISSA MELERO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01226-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

v. DISMISED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

GABRIEL RUIZ, et al., TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 6) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Narissa Melero (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed a complaint on August 13, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) The complaint alleges claims against Gabriel Ruiz, Jose Vargas, and the County of Fresno Child Protective Services related to 21 the removal of Plaintiff’s child. (Id.) 22 On October 19, 2021, the Court entered an order screening Plaintiff’s complaint and found 23 that it stated a cognizable Fourteenth Amendment due process claim against Defendant Ruiz but 24 failed to state any other claims. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.