Wofford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL WINDHAM, JR., Case No. 2:18-cv-02656-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION C. WOFFARD, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 38, Plaintiff’s opposition briefs, ECF Nos. 40, 41 & 42, and Defendants’ reply, ECF No. 47. Plaintiff alleges that each Defendant was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants argue they are entitled to summary judgment because there is no evidence that they were deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs and they are entitled to qualified immunity. ECF No. 38. The undersigned finds that there is no genuine dispute about whether Defendants’ violated Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights and thus recommends that…