Estate of Antonio Thomas v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20212:20-cv-00903California1,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTATE OF ANTONIO THOMAS, et al., No. 2:20-cv-0903 KJM DB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO et al., Defendants. 16 This matter came before the undersigned on December 10, 2021, for hearing of plaintiffs’ motion to compel defendants’ responses to requests for production of documents (“RFP”) numbers 59-67 and request for expenses pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 90.) Attorney Mark Merin appeared via Zoom on behalf of plaintiffs. Attorney Suli Mastorakos appeared via Zoom on behalf of defendants. I. Plaintiffs’ RFP No. 59 Plaintiffs’ RFP No. 59 seeks all reports of inmate-on-inmate violence at the Sacramento County Jail during 2019. (JS (ECF No. 83) at 4.) In the parties’ Joint Statement defendants assert they are working “diligently to retrieve the records,” that the production has “required significant time, resources, and workforce to accomplish, and offered “that documents be produced on a rolling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.