Beckwith-Cohen

Beckwith-Cohen v. VibrantCare Rehabilitation, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20212:21-cv-01180California3,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BECKWITH-COHEN, an individual, on No. 2:21-cv-01180-TLN-JDP behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER v. VIBRANTCARE REHABILITATION, INC., a corporation; PATSY NEUMANN; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Carol Beckwith-Cohen’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Remand. (ECF No. 5.) Defendant VibrantCare Rehabilitation, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 8.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Defendant employed Plaintiff and other individuals as physical and occupational therapists in California. (ECF No. 1 at 43.) On February 11, 2019, Plaintiff filed this putative class action in Alameda County Superior Court, alleging various state law wage and hour claims. (ECF No. 1 at 60–81.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.